You have strongly formed beliefs to defend yet you have not explained any of their content. I explain why the resort is in my view an easy target. You reject this, yet simply say is it not an EASY target. The capital letters only seek to shout your belief louder, in the hope of shouting down my views with your noise. The resort management also do the same as a general strategy. Why do you not explain why the resort is not an EASY target, and why I am wrong in my analysis. The reason is because on this subject your mind is not freely flowing and available. It is running on old tracks that run one way, in one direction, carrying the same load. The same is with the resorts practical managerial efficiency. There is no response to the issues raised, and all you offer is a standard no compromise position. Not surprisingly it is also the case with the terrorism incident. You say that the management clearly acted in an honourable and distinguished manner. You do not respond to the criticism raised. If you are aware of some factual error in my part, or perhaps some error in reasoning, then why is it that you do not say so. Also, if as you so clearly and forcefully state, the resort management acted in an entirely appropriate manner, I assume from this that you know what they did that evening. That’s nice, would you be so kind as to share that information with us. Shantam you are an ignorant fool holding on to beliefs that have no credibility. All this to protect the Universal church that you one day would like to take over from the religious fascists that currently run it. Great, it will become run by a brutal regime of religious communists. You have demonstrated a blind disregard to the well being of people who come to visit Osho. I wonder what your views of people who have no liking for the man are?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment